AI in Active Learning & Research Methodology - Section C - ASH Course Materials & Test Answers | aust.mrooms.net

Learning Goals

1. Identify and interpret AUST’s official rules and regulations in real-life university scenarios.

2. Recognize academic and ethical misconduct.

3. Apply institutional policies to propose better actions and solutions.

4. Reflect on the importance of professionalism, communication, and responsibility at AUST.

Scenario: “The Week of Missteps”

It’s the middle of the semester at the American University of Science & Technology (AUST). Nour, a

sophomore student majoring in Business & Economics, has been struggling to balance her studies,

a part-time job, and social activities. She has already received two warning emails for missing

classes but hasn’t read them yet because she “rarely checks” her AUST email account. Instead,

she prefers using her personal Gmail.

Over the past few weeks, Nour has missed seven classes in her Principles of Management course

without filing any petition for excused absences. Her professor reports her case to the Dean of

Students, but Nour assumes it’s “no big deal.” When her parents receive a call from the University

about her absenteeism, she becomes upset and blames the instructor for “exaggerating things.”

The Registration Dilemma: Registration week arrives, and Nour realizes she hasn’t yet met her

academic advisor to plan her courses. She tells her friends that “advisor meetings are useless”

since she can register online anyway. Because she forgot her portal password, she borrows her

friend’s login credentials and registers by proxy, adding courses without confirming prerequisites or

checking for time conflicts. She even registers for a senior-level elective that requires a course she

hasn’t completed yet. When she later discovers a clash between two course schedules, she tries to

drop one after the deadline, assuming she can “explain it later.” The result: she receives an

automatic “F” for failing to follow withdrawal procedures.

Communication Chaos: Nour decides to email her professor to ask for help, but she does so from

her personal email, using an informal tone and no subject line. Her message reads: “Hey prof, I

can’t fix the schedule thing. Can you just move me to another section? thx.”

The professor replies politely, reminding her to use her AUST email, include course details, and

follow university procedures. Instead of acknowledging the advice, Nour forwards the professor’s

email to a WhatsApp group with classmates and writes sarcastically, “Look how picky some profs

are!” Later that week, Nour sends another email to the Dean of Students demanding that her

professor be “replaced for being unfair.” The email has spelling errors, no greeting, and no course

information. It is flagged as unprofessional and forwarded to her advisor for follow-up.

The Midterm Exam Incident: On the day of her Accounting midterm, Nour arrives 10 minutes late,

without her AUST ID. She argues with the proctor, claiming she “forgot it at home” and insists on

sitting for the exam anyway. She borrows a calculator from another student during the exam even

though sharing materials is prohibited. Midway through, she is caught whispering and glancing at

her friend’s paper. When the instructor confiscates her exam sheet, Nour loudly protests, causing

disruption in the room.

A disciplinary report is filed. According to university rules, cheating in exams leads to disciplinary

probation and an “F” in the course. Nour, however, posts on social media accusing the university of

being “too strict” and “unfair to students under stress.”

The Internship Problem: Later in the semester, Nour’s friend tells her about an internship

opportunity at a marketing agency. Without consulting her department, Nour applies and gets

accepted. She does not obtain the official Letter of Intent from AUST, nor does she submit her

supervisor’s contact information or internship plan.

After finishing her four weeks at the agency, she forgets to submit her final internship report or

prepare for the required public presentation before the departmental jury. She receives an

automatic “F” on the internship course. When she discovers this, she emails her instructor

demanding a grade change, claiming she “worked hard and deserves credit.”

The instructor explains that grade changes must go through a formal petition process and can only

occur if there was a miscalculation or approved incomplete grade. Frustrated, Nour contacts the

Registrar’s Office directly, bypassing all procedures, and sends multiple informal emails, each

written in capital letters.

The Consequences: By the end of the semester, Nour faces several academic and disciplinary

issues: Academic Withdrawal (AW) from one course due to absenteeism; “F” grades for two

courses due to policy violations; probation for a cumulative GPA below 2.00; and disciplinary

probation for cheating and misconduct. Her advisor finally contacts her for an urgent meeting to

discuss next steps. Nour admits she “didn’t know most of these rules existed,” realizing too late that

every misstep was clearly outlined in the university handbook.

Criterion Weight Description

Rule Identification 40% Accurate identification and reference to AUST regulations

Proposed Alternatives 40% Clarity and appropriateness of suggested actions

Reflection 20% Insightfulness and understanding of responsibility and ethic

Question: Part I – Identify Violations

List all the AUST policies Nour violated. For each, provide the name or section of the rule, what she did wrong, and the appropriate consequence according to AUST policy.

View this question

Crowdly

AI in Active Learning & Research Methodology - Section C - ASH

Want instant access to all verified answers on aust.mrooms.net?