logo

Crowdly

Browser

Add to Chrome

PVL1501-25-EX10

Looking for PVL1501-25-EX10 test answers and solutions? Browse our comprehensive collection of verified answers for PVL1501-25-EX10 at claw.myexams.unisa.ac.za.

Get instant access to accurate answers and detailed explanations for your course questions. Our community-driven platform helps students succeed!

Indicate which one of the following statements regarding a minor’s capacity to contract is incorrect:

0%
0%
100%
0%
View this question

Mandy and Sizwe concluded a civil union two years ago. Mandy goes to Zambia to visit her sister. While in Zambia Mandy meets Thomas and they have an adulterous relationship. Upon her return to South Africa, Mandy discovers that she is four months pregnant. A child, Romeo, is subsequently born. Choose the only correct option:

0%
100%
0%
0%
View this question

Which Act governs a minor’s capacity to be held criminally accountable?

0%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

Zweli was presumed dead by the High Court in 2018 and his estate was divided among his heirs. He has reappeared and approached the same court to set aside the order presuming him dead. Mpiyakhe, his uncle, was a beneficiary of his estate. Mpiyakhe refused to return the benefits or to pay an amount equal to their value. From the options below, choose the only correct option:

100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

Choose the only incorrect option.

0%
0%
100%
0%
View this question

Indicate which one of the following statements regarding domicile is incorrect:

0%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

Choose the only correct option. The process in terms of which a guardian gives general consent to his or her minor child to conclude all transactions related to the minor’s business, is known as ...

0%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

In

…………………………………………… the Constitutional Court held that section 40 of the

Children’s Act 38 of 2005, which deals with the rights of children born as a

result of artificial fertilisation, was unconstitutional:

0%
0%
0%
100%
View this question

Choose the only correct option. In Naville v Naville it was held that …

0%
0%
100%
0%
View this question

Jason is 16 years old. He concludes a contract with Mr Steenkamp, an adult, to buy a second-hand car for R30 000. He pays a deposit of R3 000 and Mr Steenkakmp delivers the car to him. Jason now refuses to pay the remainder of the contract price on the ground that he is a minor and therefore is not liable in terms of the contract. In which one of the following scenarios will Jason be delictually liable to Mr Steenkamp on the ground of misrepresentation?

0%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

Want instant access to all verified answers on claw.myexams.unisa.ac.za?

Get Unlimited Answers To Exam Questions - Install Crowdly Extension Now!

Browser

Add to Chrome