Crowdly
Add to Chrome
CRW2601-26-EX06
Looking for CRW2601-26-EX06 test answers and solutions? Browse our comprehensive collection of verified answers for CRW2601-26-EX06 at claw.myexams.unisa.ac.za.
Get instant access to accurate answers and detailed explanations for your course questions. Our community-driven platform helps students succeed!
X’s act is the factual cause of Y’s death if it is a conditio sine qua non for Y’s death, which means that there is:
100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question
In Fourie 2001 (2) SACR 674 (C), X’s defence of absence of unlawfulness on a charge of exceeding the speed limit was:
100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question
When proving X’s intention, the court must try and place itself in the position of:
0%
0%
100%
0%
View this question
The defences excluding criminal capacity are:
0%
100%
0%
0%
View this question
Read the following facts then choose the correct option: X wants to burn down a building. He foresees the possibility that somebody (Y) may inside the building but nevertheless decides to proceed with his plan ‘come what may’. X thereafter sets fire to the building; Y is inside the building and dies in the flames. Which form of culpability is applicable?
100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question
Which ONE of the following statements is correct?
0%
0%
0%
100%
View this question
The concept of the reasonable person means that the personal characteristics of the person are:
100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question
The general rule regarding omissions is that there is a:
0%
0%
100%
0%
View this question
The result of the Chretien 1981 (1) SA 1097 (A) is that as far as X’s liability is concerned, intoxication may NOT have one of following effects. It may:
100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question
Where X urges his dog to bite someone, X’s conduct would be regarded as:
100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question