Crowdly
Add to Chrome
English for Specific Purposes. Legal English - 3 (2025/2026 modules: 1,2,3) (Борзова Н.А.)
Looking for English for Specific Purposes. Legal English - 3 (2025/2026 modules: 1,2,3) (Борзова Н.А.) test answers and solutions? Browse our comprehensive collection of verified answers for English for Specific Purposes. Legal English - 3 (2025/2026 modules: 1,2,3) (Борзова Н.А.) at edu.hse.ru.
Get instant access to accurate answers and detailed explanations for your course questions. Our community-driven platform helps students succeed!
The court affirmed that states have a duty to prevent
, reinforcing
obligations beyond climate-specific treaties.
States that are already formally not members of the Paris Agreement are released from all international legal duties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Because the ICJ issued only an
,
its decision does not legally compel governments to enact anything.
Read the statements and identify whether they are True, False or Not Given.
The ICJ's advisory opinion on climate obligations originated from a piece of work undertaken by university students.
Activists argue the ruling could strengthen the moral argument in climate negotiations and support ongoing legal actions against some states or corporations.
The court unanimously characterized climate change as an
that the population is obligated to be protected
from.
Some countries have acknowledged and pledged to adhere to the ICJ's advisory opinion on climate change.
Fill in the gaps. Write NO MORE THAN FOUR WORDS.
According to the
, a
nation's failure to shield the climate from greenhouse-gas emissions could be
classified as an internationally wrongful act.
The opinion details specific compensation for states seeking compensation from major emitters for climate damage.
The ICJ did not reject considering the matter following a formal request from the
.