The debate about whether it should be permissible

They both decided to kill their nephews for revenge

They intend for the patient to die

They intend to reduce suffering, indignities, and financial burdens for

the patient or their family

They intend to discreetly circumvent the law

They intend to comply with the law

Permitting active euthanasia may reduce overall suffering and promote

patient autonomy

Permitting active euthanasia will lead to no one using medical care

because they will be afraid the doctors will kill them without any good reason

Permitting active euthanasia will encourage medical professionals to

expend less energy saving lives and will probably lead to the involuntary killing

of patients

Permitting active euthanasia will cause most medical professional to

quit, which will create chaos in the healthcare system

We should always aim

to make everyone happy

We should always

consider how our actions affect other people’s happiness

We should try to produce as much happiness as possible

We should aim to make everyone equally happy

We can criticize the

norms of a society as inconsistent or based on false beliefs

Nothing we do can be

criticized

Our commitments rest

on false beliefs

There are no good

reasons to act in a particular way

You have to make friends with everyone.

As long as you mean well, it doesn't matter what the end result of your actions are.

You have to promote other people's ends or goals by any means possible..

You cannot use someone as if they were an object or tool

Moral rules or principles

Virtues or human excellences

Obligatory actions

Praiseworthy actions