You are going to read a newspaper article about

people’s attitudes to their possessions in a digital age. For questions 1-5,

choose the answer (

Less is More

How do people

cut down on their possessions in a digital age

The 17th century

French artist Poussin is well-known for his paintings, usually set in serene

and idyllic pastoral landscapes, which convey serious lessons for mankind.

These messages are sometimes a bit obscure, and some continue to puzzle art

historians, but in the picture Landscape

There are

hundreds of websites extolling the virtues of uncluttered living. 'I can carry

everything I own/ says Kevin. 'I have a few changes of clothing, laptop, two

pots, bowl, spoon, fork, futon and flask. I like sitting on the floor eating

fruit, nuts, vegetables and rice.' At this point I really hated Kevin, but I

should have known better because he continued, 'The nice thing about a bare

room is that you begin to notice other things like the changing sunlight during

the day. Many possessions tend to tie one down mentally and physically - seeing

too much permanence in inanimate objects rather than being aware of the

vitality of the outside world of nature.'

Everyone is

trying to cut down on things these days. People are trying to reduce their

carbon footprints, their waistlines, their monthly outgoings. What's more,

there's a general fear that people are becoming asphyxiated by their

possessions, and this is fuelled by the knowledge that, according to

innumerable sociological surveys, the leading pastime these days seems to be

shopping. It's true, sales of e-readers and e-books outstrip those of

paperbacks, and we know that oniy losers and reactionaries buy camera film

today. As a result, the need for bookshelves and photo albums is cut out.

However, today's

new minimalists don't urge us to bum our books and crush our CDs, but just make

sure we have them as digital files, So, for example, I have digitised versions

of some of my old vinyl LP records and haven't, as yet, stirred myself to take

the LPs to the nearest charity shop - and I admit I shall probably go on

keeping them. Technology has, perhaps, gone beyond our dreams and there is

always the lurking suspicion that our hard drives will crash and all will be

lost. Far more important, however, is the fact that our memories are so

inextricably tied to our possessions that we can't get rid of stuff. No matter

how much glossy magazines insist that we should.

We are not

exactly suffering withdrawal symptoms as we try to break our addiction to

objects. We are just acquiring new stuff that means we can bin or recycle our

old stuff. Diogenes, who was quite the cynic philosopher, would have seen

through this imposture in seconds. Those who can afford to, buy the kit to make

the minimalist dream a reality, but they are still investing in commodities,

just different ones from those they collected a decade earlier.

A few years ago

I wrote a piece predicting the demise of incredibly expensive watches,

believing that they would inevitably be eclipsed by the amazingly more

versatile mobile phone, no matter how beautifully crafted and elegant they

might be, but they still seem to be covetable objects of conspicuous

consumption. Clearly the ostensible function of a £20k watch is negligible

enticement to owning it. Here then is another manifestation of the lure of

possessions - we are not only sentimental in our attachment to them, but also

status driven.

I'm happy to

have found another website which seems to solve a whole lot of problems at once

- a thriving online advice surgery offering storage solutions. The interior

designer responsible for this does not counsel getting rid of stuff, but rather

recommends buying more stuff (elegant flexible trugs, colourful lidded

containers) to hide the first lot of stuff from view. I love this philosophy -

get that decluttered minimalist look, convince yourself you've got your desire

for possessions under control, without having to lose a thing. There's no

reason to think such bad faith will change soon: we aren't ruthless enough to

emulate Diogenes and cast away all our possessions.

4. The writer thinks minimalism will

not succeed in the long term because of people’s ... .

You are going to read a newspaper article about

people’s attitudes to their possessions in a digital age. For questions 1-5,

choose the answer (

Less is More

How do people

cut down on their possessions in a digital age

The 17th century

French artist Poussin is well-known for his paintings, usually set in serene

and idyllic pastoral landscapes, which convey serious lessons for mankind.

These messages are sometimes a bit obscure, and some continue to puzzle art

historians, but in the picture Landscape

There are

hundreds of websites extolling the virtues of uncluttered living. 'I can carry

everything I own/ says Kevin. 'I have a few changes of clothing, laptop, two

pots, bowl, spoon, fork, futon and flask. I like sitting on the floor eating

fruit, nuts, vegetables and rice.' At this point I really hated Kevin, but I

should have known better because he continued, 'The nice thing about a bare

room is that you begin to notice other things like the changing sunlight during

the day. Many possessions tend to tie one down mentally and physically - seeing

too much permanence in inanimate objects rather than being aware of the

vitality of the outside world of nature.'

Everyone is

trying to cut down on things these days. People are trying to reduce their

carbon footprints, their waistlines, their monthly outgoings. What's more,

there's a general fear that people are becoming asphyxiated by their

possessions, and this is fuelled by the knowledge that, according to

innumerable sociological surveys, the leading pastime these days seems to be

shopping. It's true, sales of e-readers and e-books outstrip those of

paperbacks, and we know that oniy losers and reactionaries buy camera film

today. As a result, the need for bookshelves and photo albums is cut out.

However, today's

new minimalists don't urge us to bum our books and crush our CDs, but just make

sure we have them as digital files, So, for example, I have digitised versions

of some of my old vinyl LP records and haven't, as yet, stirred myself to take

the LPs to the nearest charity shop - and I admit I shall probably go on

keeping them. Technology has, perhaps, gone beyond our dreams and there is

always the lurking suspicion that our hard drives will crash and all will be

lost. Far more important, however, is the fact that our memories are so

inextricably tied to our possessions that we can't get rid of stuff. No matter

how much glossy magazines insist that we should.

We are not

exactly suffering withdrawal symptoms as we try to break our addiction to

objects. We are just acquiring new stuff that means we can bin or recycle our

old stuff. Diogenes, who was quite the cynic philosopher, would have seen

through this imposture in seconds. Those who can afford to, buy the kit to make

the minimalist dream a reality, but they are still investing in commodities,

just different ones from those they collected a decade earlier.

A few years ago

I wrote a piece predicting the demise of incredibly expensive watches,

believing that they would inevitably be eclipsed by the amazingly more

versatile mobile phone, no matter how beautifully crafted and elegant they

might be, but they still seem to be covetable objects of conspicuous

consumption. Clearly the ostensible function of a £20k watch is negligible

enticement to owning it. Here then is another manifestation of the lure of

possessions - we are not only sentimental in our attachment to them, but also

status driven.

I'm happy to

have found another website which seems to solve a whole lot of problems at once

- a thriving online advice surgery offering storage solutions. The interior

designer responsible for this does not counsel getting rid of stuff, but rather

recommends buying more stuff (elegant flexible trugs, colourful lidded

containers) to hide the first lot of stuff from view. I love this philosophy -

get that decluttered minimalist look, convince yourself you've got your desire

for possessions under control, without having to lose a thing. There's no

reason to think such bad faith will change soon: we aren't ruthless enough to

emulate Diogenes and cast away all our possessions.

5. 

According to the writer, people

invest in smart new storage in order to ... .

You are going to read a newspaper article about

people’s attitudes to their possessions in a digital age. For questions 1-5,

choose the answer (

Less is More

How do people

cut down on their possessions in a digital age

The 17th century

French artist Poussin is well-known for his paintings, usually set in serene

and idyllic pastoral landscapes, which convey serious lessons for mankind.

These messages are sometimes a bit obscure, and some continue to puzzle art

historians, but in the picture Landscape

There are

hundreds of websites extolling the virtues of uncluttered living. 'I can carry

everything I own/ says Kevin. 'I have a few changes of clothing, laptop, two

pots, bowl, spoon, fork, futon and flask. I like sitting on the floor eating

fruit, nuts, vegetables and rice.' At this point I really hated Kevin, but I

should have known better because he continued, 'The nice thing about a bare

room is that you begin to notice other things like the changing sunlight during

the day. Many possessions tend to tie one down mentally and physically - seeing

too much permanence in inanimate objects rather than being aware of the

vitality of the outside world of nature.'

Everyone is

trying to cut down on things these days. People are trying to reduce their

carbon footprints, their waistlines, their monthly outgoings. What's more,

there's a general fear that people are becoming asphyxiated by their

possessions, and this is fuelled by the knowledge that, according to

innumerable sociological surveys, the leading pastime these days seems to be

shopping. It's true, sales of e-readers and e-books outstrip those of

paperbacks, and we know that oniy losers and reactionaries buy camera film

today. As a result, the need for bookshelves and photo albums is cut out.

However, today's

new minimalists don't urge us to bum our books and crush our CDs, but just make

sure we have them as digital files, So, for example, I have digitised versions

of some of my old vinyl LP records and haven't, as yet, stirred myself to take

the LPs to the nearest charity shop - and I admit I shall probably go on

keeping them. Technology has, perhaps, gone beyond our dreams and there is

always the lurking suspicion that our hard drives will crash and all will be

lost. Far more important, however, is the fact that our memories are so

inextricably tied to our possessions that we can't get rid of stuff. No matter

how much glossy magazines insist that we should.

We are not

exactly suffering withdrawal symptoms as we try to break our addiction to

objects. We are just acquiring new stuff that means we can bin or recycle our

old stuff. Diogenes, who was quite the cynic philosopher, would have seen

through this imposture in seconds. Those who can afford to, buy the kit to make

the minimalist dream a reality, but they are still investing in commodities,

just different ones from those they collected a decade earlier.

A few years ago

I wrote a piece predicting the demise of incredibly expensive watches,

believing that they would inevitably be eclipsed by the amazingly more

versatile mobile phone, no matter how beautifully crafted and elegant they

might be, but they still seem to be covetable objects of conspicuous

consumption. Clearly the ostensible function of a £20k watch is negligible

enticement to owning it. Here then is another manifestation of the lure of

possessions - we are not only sentimental in our attachment to them, but also

status driven.

I'm happy to

have found another website which seems to solve a whole lot of problems at once

- a thriving online advice surgery offering storage solutions. The interior

designer responsible for this does not counsel getting rid of stuff, but rather

recommends buying more stuff (elegant flexible trugs, colourful lidded

containers) to hide the first lot of stuff from view. I love this philosophy -

get that decluttered minimalist look, convince yourself you've got your desire

for possessions under control, without having to lose a thing. There's no

reason to think such bad faith will change soon: we aren't ruthless enough to

emulate Diogenes and cast away all our possessions.

3. In the writer’s opinion, what

prompts people to want to reduce their possessions?

You are going to read a newspaper article about

people’s attitudes to their possessions in a digital age. For questions 1-5,

choose the answer (

Less is More

How do people

cut down on their possessions in a digital age

The 17th century

French artist Poussin is well-known for his paintings, usually set in serene

and idyllic pastoral landscapes, which convey serious lessons for mankind.

These messages are sometimes a bit obscure, and some continue to puzzle art

historians, but in the picture Landscape

There are

hundreds of websites extolling the virtues of uncluttered living. 'I can carry

everything I own/ says Kevin. 'I have a few changes of clothing, laptop, two

pots, bowl, spoon, fork, futon and flask. I like sitting on the floor eating

fruit, nuts, vegetables and rice.' At this point I really hated Kevin, but I

should have known better because he continued, 'The nice thing about a bare

room is that you begin to notice other things like the changing sunlight during

the day. Many possessions tend to tie one down mentally and physically - seeing

too much permanence in inanimate objects rather than being aware of the

vitality of the outside world of nature.'

Everyone is

trying to cut down on things these days. People are trying to reduce their

carbon footprints, their waistlines, their monthly outgoings. What's more,

there's a general fear that people are becoming asphyxiated by their

possessions, and this is fuelled by the knowledge that, according to

innumerable sociological surveys, the leading pastime these days seems to be

shopping. It's true, sales of e-readers and e-books outstrip those of

paperbacks, and we know that oniy losers and reactionaries buy camera film

today. As a result, the need for bookshelves and photo albums is cut out.

However, today's

new minimalists don't urge us to bum our books and crush our CDs, but just make

sure we have them as digital files, So, for example, I have digitised versions

of some of my old vinyl LP records and haven't, as yet, stirred myself to take

the LPs to the nearest charity shop - and I admit I shall probably go on

keeping them. Technology has, perhaps, gone beyond our dreams and there is

always the lurking suspicion that our hard drives will crash and all will be

lost. Far more important, however, is the fact that our memories are so

inextricably tied to our possessions that we can't get rid of stuff. No matter

how much glossy magazines insist that we should.

We are not

exactly suffering withdrawal symptoms as we try to break our addiction to

objects. We are just acquiring new stuff that means we can bin or recycle our

old stuff. Diogenes, who was quite the cynic philosopher, would have seen

through this imposture in seconds. Those who can afford to, buy the kit to make

the minimalist dream a reality, but they are still investing in commodities,

just different ones from those they collected a decade earlier.

A few years ago

I wrote a piece predicting the demise of incredibly expensive watches,

believing that they would inevitably be eclipsed by the amazingly more

versatile mobile phone, no matter how beautifully crafted and elegant they

might be, but they still seem to be covetable objects of conspicuous

consumption. Clearly the ostensible function of a £20k watch is negligible

enticement to owning it. Here then is another manifestation of the lure of

possessions - we are not only sentimental in our attachment to them, but also

status driven.

I'm happy to

have found another website which seems to solve a whole lot of problems at once

- a thriving online advice surgery offering storage solutions. The interior

designer responsible for this does not counsel getting rid of stuff, but rather

recommends buying more stuff (elegant flexible trugs, colourful lidded

containers) to hide the first lot of stuff from view. I love this philosophy -

get that decluttered minimalist look, convince yourself you've got your desire

for possessions under control, without having to lose a thing. There's no

reason to think such bad faith will change soon: we aren't ruthless enough to

emulate Diogenes and cast away all our possessions.

2. What lesson did the writer take from

his own reaction to Kevin’s blog?

You are going to read a newspaper article about people’s attitudes to their possessions in a digital age. For questions 1-5, choose the answer (А, В, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text. 

Less is More

How do people cut down on their possessions in a digital age

The 17th century French artist Poussin is well-known for his paintings, usually set in serene and idyllic pastoral landscapes, which convey serious lessons for mankind. These messages are sometimes a bit obscure, and some continue to puzzle art historians, but in the picture Landscape with Diogenes, things seem relatively straightforward. The ancient philosopher Diogenes is depicted casting away his last possession, a drinking bowl. He realises he doesn't need it after seeing a youth cupping a hand to drink from a river. The significance for us is that Diogenes' spiritual descendants known as 'new minimalists' are now everywhere, if not as radically possession-free as he was.

There are hundreds of websites extolling the virtues of uncluttered living. 'I can carry everything I own/ says Kevin. 'I have a few changes of clothing, laptop, two pots, bowl, spoon, fork, futon and flask. I like sitting on the floor eating fruit, nuts, vegetables and rice.' At this point I really hated Kevin, but I should have known better because he continued, 'The nice thing about a bare room is that you begin to notice other things like the changing sunlight during the day. Many possessions tend to tie one down mentally and physically - seeing too much permanence in inanimate objects rather than being aware of the vitality of the outside world of nature.'

Everyone is trying to cut down on things these days. People are trying to reduce their carbon footprints, their waistlines, their monthly outgoings. What's more, there's a general fear that people are becoming asphyxiated by their possessions, and this is fuelled by the knowledge that, according to innumerable sociological surveys, the leading pastime these days seems to be shopping. It's true, sales of e-readers and e-books outstrip those of paperbacks, and we know that oniy losers and reactionaries buy camera film today. As a result, the need for bookshelves and photo albums is cut out.

However, today's new minimalists don't urge us to bum our books and crush our CDs, but just make sure we have them as digital files, So, for example, I have digitised versions of some of my old vinyl LP records and haven't, as yet, stirred myself to take the LPs to the nearest charity shop - and I admit I shall probably go on keeping them. Technology has, perhaps, gone beyond our dreams and there is always the lurking suspicion that our hard drives will crash and all will be lost. Far more important, however, is the fact that our memories are so inextricably tied to our possessions that we can't get rid of stuff. No matter how much glossy magazines insist that we should.

We are not exactly suffering withdrawal symptoms as we try to break our addiction to objects. We are just acquiring new stuff that means we can bin or recycle our old stuff. Diogenes, who was quite the cynic philosopher, would have seen through this imposture in seconds. Those who can afford to, buy the kit to make the minimalist dream a reality, but they are still investing in commodities, just different ones from those they collected a decade earlier.

A few years ago I wrote a piece predicting the demise of incredibly expensive watches, believing that they would inevitably be eclipsed by the amazingly more versatile mobile phone, no matter how beautifully crafted and elegant they might be, but they still seem to be covetable objects of conspicuous consumption. Clearly the ostensible function of a £20k watch is negligible enticement to owning it. Here then is another manifestation of the lure of possessions - we are not only sentimental in our attachment to them, but also status driven.

I'm happy to have found another website which seems to solve a whole lot of problems at once - a thriving online advice surgery offering storage solutions. The interior designer responsible for this does not counsel getting rid of stuff, but rather recommends buying more stuff (elegant flexible trugs, colourful lidded containers) to hide the first lot of stuff from view. I love this philosophy - get that decluttered minimalist look, convince yourself you've got your desire for possessions under control, without having to lose a thing. There's no reason to think such bad faith will change soon: we aren't ruthless enough to emulate Diogenes and cast away all our possessions.

1. Why does the writer refer to a painting by the artist Poussin?

You will hear five short extracts in

which London residents talk about how they came to be living there and

1.    

You will hear five short extracts in

which London residents talk about how they came to be living there and

1.

Match

the speakers (1-5) with their explanations how they came to be living in

London.