Kanemex itself was the stakeholder with the most power in the situation

production was eventually shut down due to persistant breaches of their operating conditions from the regulator

the company was forced to spend large amounts of money because they did not engage wholeheartedly with the local community's concerns

the company should have avoided creating fumes that were outside their permissible limits. Once they were caught, community trust was lost

the company did not monitor their emissions closely enough, and could have avoided added expense by using more sensitive equipment from the start.

we should start by researching

the "triple bottom line" concept can be used as a reminder of potential tradeoffs that might be necessary to consider

an engineer would typically cooperate with those from other disciplines who specialise in this area

it is critically important to have a good base of objective knowledge before starting to debate subjective judgements

you should focus mostly on finding potential negative effects, as the positive effects will be already known

Higher interest rates leading to a decrease in companies investing in upgrading machinery

Reduced fares for public transport cause an increase in ticket revenue

Supply shortages of critical minerals leading to increasing prices

Shifting demand towards sustainable wood products leading to decreases in harvesting from native forest

Increased efficiency in textile manufacturing leads to an increase in "fast fashion"

Community resistance to projects like this is unlikely to have any direct effects on the financiers.

The financiers are likely to demand higher interest on their loans to the company, due to perceived higher risks in the project.

The financiers would typically want the project to be successful.

They would generally be considered to be a low-power stakeholder and have only slight influence on the project.

Potential for job creation

Community safety concerns

Environmental safety concerns

Potential for increased tax payments

Receiving bribes from the company in return for project approvals