Designs Act 2003 (Cth)

Innovative Design Protection Bill 2012 (USA)

Design Piracy Prohibition Bill 2006 (USA) 

Madeleine Sy Chan and Sharon Givoni, ‘Utilising Trade Mark Laws to Protect Fashion Designs’ (2012) 25(3) Australian Intellectual Property Bulletin 51 

Director of Public Prosecutions v Moran (2012) 37 VR 627 [21].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Moran (2012) 37 VR 624, 627 [21].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Moran (2012) 37 VR, 627 [21].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Moran (2012) 37 VR 624-633, 627 [21].

When a defendant or judgment debtor stays in their home or business and won't answer the door or gate to be served with court documents.

Hiding from one's creditors (e.g. by not answering the door or pretending not to be there) so as not to receive a summons requiring personal service.

To seclude oneself in one's house in order to evade the demands of creditors.

Avoiding contact with a creditor or a creditor's representative by remaining indoors.

Australian Resources and Energy Law Journal

Monash University Law Review

Australian Mining Law Journal

Alternative Law Journal

Diane SIVASUBRAMANIAM et al, ‘Protecting Human Rights in Australian Investigative Interviews: The Role of Recording and Interview Duration Limits’ (2014) 20(2) Australian Journal of Human Rights 107-132. 

Diane Sivasubramaniam et al, ‘Protecting Human Rights in Australian Investigative Interviews: The Role of Recording and Interview Duration Limits’ (2014) 20(2) Australian Journal of Human Rights 107. 

Diane Sivasubramaniam et al, ‘Protecting Human Rights in Australian Investigative Interviews: The Role of Recording and Interview Duration Limits’ (2014) (20(2)) AJHR 107. 

Diane Sivasubramaniam, Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Martin Fraser and Melissa Martin,  ‘Protecting Human Rights in Australian Investigative Interviews: The Role of Recording and Interview Duration Limits’ (2014) 20(2) Australian Journal of Human Rights 107.

the reduction of economic activity or property values in a particular area resulting from expected or possible future development or restriction of development.

the reduction in marketability and value of land as a result of a public sector decision.

land, the value of which, is adversely affected by a proposal contained in a development plan by a public authority.

a situation in which land becomes unsaleable or reduced in value because it is required for, or adversely affected by, a public or private project.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Safe Breast Imaging Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 998

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Titan Marketing Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 913

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Safe Breast Imaging Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 238

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Stott [2014] FCA 88

Alcohol

Weather

Driver error

Mechanical malfunction 

online and physical copies

as a physical copy only

online only

the library does not hold this book

Environmental Liability Law Review

Environmental Law Journal

Ecclesiastical Law Journal

Elder Law Journal