Looking for English phonetics and phonology (2024–2025) (1BA/02) (Michalski) test answers and solutions? Browse our comprehensive collection of verified answers for English phonetics and phonology (2024–2025) (1BA/02) (Michalski) at lms.amu.edu.pl.
Get instant access to accurate answers and detailed explanations for your course questions. Our community-driven platform helps students succeed!
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈmɑːskt || ˈmæskt/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈnwɑː/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/reˈhɜːs || reˈhɝːs/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈpɔːh/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈnjuː/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈbæhstə || ˈbæhstɚ/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈkraɪm/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈnpɪŋ/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈtɑːsk || ˈtæsk/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈne.ɒn || ne.ɑːn/