Focus solely on speed of development and disregard future maintenance

Only develop MVPs with no need for scalability

Outsource all Low-Code development to external vendors

Regularly refactor and review the architecture of applications, ensuring they align with long-term business goals and evolving technology standards

Non-technical users and citizen developers

IT specialists only

Professional developers

Higher costs of development

Longer development cycles

Faster application development

Low-Code is harder to use than No-Code

No-Code is only for large enterprises

Low-Code allows some coding, while No-Code requires none

By fully committing to one platform and avoiding any integrations with external systems

By limiting the use of the platform to short-term projects only

By using an open-standards-based Low-Code platform that supports exportable code and interoperable components

They remain unchanged and apply directly without modification

They require additional governance controls to ensure that non-technical users adhere to security, compliance, and performance best practices

They require less governance due to the simplicity of Low-Code platforms

By increasing the need for external databases to handle performance

By offering customization options for specific performance optimizations but potentially requiring traditional coding for more complex logic

By limiting the number of processes that can be automated

Only develop applications that do not handle sensitive data

Leverage Low-Code platforms that offer built-in compliance tools, such as data encryption, audit trails, and secure storage options

Develop custom security features for each application manually

Avoid using Low-Code platforms for regulated industries altogether