Crowdly
Add to Chrome
365.212/3/4/5/62/63/86/87/99/335/336, UE Hands-on AI I, Rainer Dangl / Sohvi Iiri Maria Luukkonen / Mohammed Abbass / Johannes Schimunek, 2025W
Looking for 365.212/3/4/5/62/63/86/87/99/335/336, UE Hands-on AI I, Rainer Dangl / Sohvi Iiri Maria Luukkonen / Mohammed Abbass / Johannes Schimunek, 2025W test answers and solutions? Browse our comprehensive collection of verified answers for 365.212/3/4/5/62/63/86/87/99/335/336, UE Hands-on AI I, Rainer Dangl / Sohvi Iiri Maria Luukkonen / Mohammed Abbass / Johannes Schimunek, 2025W at moodle.jku.at.
Get instant access to accurate answers and detailed explanations for your course questions. Our community-driven platform helps students succeed!
Why do you think are the fitted parameters not completely identical to the true model parameters?
Comment on these numbers (number of parameters and features) - why do you have exactly these values?
If you compare the two losses for epochs=5 and epochs=15 to the loss that was obtained with np.polyfit - How do you interpret these values? Why are they similar/different?
Optimize the hyperparameters so that you achieve at least an 82% test accuracy. Keep the seed the same as above for fair comparison.Upload a screenshot showing the seed, your selected hyperparameter values, and the test set accuracy. No text answer needed.
Example for the screenshot:
Comment on the horizontal flip evaluation.
- Why is the performance better than for inverted pixels?
- Does it seem reasonable or surprising that the three items identified above are the most affected compared with the others?
Comment on the inverted pixels evaluation. Why is the performance so low?