Crowdly
Add to Chrome
Právnická angličtina IV - Popelíková - čt 16:00
Looking for Právnická angličtina IV - Popelíková - čt 16:00 test answers and solutions? Browse our comprehensive collection of verified answers for Právnická angličtina IV - Popelíková - čt 16:00 at moodle.prf.cuni.cz.
Get instant access to accurate answers and detailed explanations for your course questions. Our community-driven platform helps students succeed!
Derivation:
His action failed because (PROPORTION) and reasonable force may be used to restrain a trespasser.
The “give and take” principle also applies to public nuisance: thus a temporary obstruction on a highway, if reasonable in its size and duration, may be (permit).
Derivation:
Plaintiff’s (NEGLIGENTLY) action failed because she was not owed a duty of care.
Derivation:
The longer the duration of an (INTERFERE) the more likely it is to be a nuisance.
Derivation:
He succeeded in his false (PRISON) action.
Derivation:
Injury to passers-by was not reasonably (FORESEE).
Derivation:
It may be relevant to consider how far the act complained is unusual or
Derivation:
If the plaintiff is to succeed in a defamation action he must show that the statement is
Derivation:
(CONFINE) may be the result of withholding a means of escape.