Add to Chrome
✅ The verified answer to this question is available below. Our community-reviewed solutions help you understand the material better.
In S v Kohler 1979 (1) SA 861 (T) ...
the court had to interpret section 10(1) of the Stock Theft Act 26 of 1923
the court had to interpret section 2(1)(b) of the Legal Deposit of Publications Act 17 of 1982
the court heard an appeal against the decision of a magistrate's court in which the accused was found guilty of contravening a municipal by-law because he kept a duck within the municipal boundaries without the required licence
the court heard an appeal against the decision of a magistrate's court in which the accused was found guilty of contravening a municipal by-law because he kept a peacock within the municipal boundaries without the required licence.
Get Unlimited Answers To Exam Questions - Install Crowdly Extension Now!