A mid-sized firm designs a new leadership development program but restricts nominations to employees already identified as 'high potential' by their direct managers, with no formal audit of who is or is not being nominated across demographic groups. An HR adviser warns this risks inequitable access despite the program being technically open. Which evaluation BEST reflects the lecture's framing of this risk?

Question

Accepted Answer

This risk aligns with the lecture: structural barriers such as informal nomination processes can create inequity even when a program is technically open to all

Answer

This risk is unfounded, since the lecture states EEO in HRD applies only to mandatory, not discretionary, development programs

Answer

This risk is unfounded: the lecture states informal manager nomination processes cannot create inequitable access to training

Answer

This risk is unrelated to EEO, since leadership development programs are excluded from the lecture's EEO in HRD content

Crowdly

A mid-sized firm designs a new leadership development program but restricts nomi...

Want instant access to all verified answers on moodle.pia.edu.au?