A lecturer compares the bow-wow , yo-he-ho , and divine-source accounts of language origin, then adds genetic, neurological, and anthropological evidence. Which conclusion best fits a modern linguistic perspective?
Select TWO correct options

Question

A lecturer compares the  bow-wow ,  yo-he-ho , and  divine-source  accounts of language origin, then adds genetic, neurological, and anthropological evidence. Which conclusion best fits a modern linguistic perspective? 
 Select TWO correct options

Accepted Answer

Several kinds of evidence must be considered.

Accepted Answer

No single classical theory is sufficient.

Answer

Language emerged without biological adaptation.

Answer

The divine-source view is empirically confirmed.

Crowdly

A lecturer compares the bow-wow , yo-he-ho , and divine-source accounts of l...

Want instant access to all verified answers on learn.ucu.edu.ua?