Add to Chrome
✅ The verified answer to this question is available below. Our community-reviewed solutions help you understand the material better.
Tindall v Thames Valley Police [2024] UKSC 33 was primarily decided on which of the following grounds?
The claim failed because Mr. Tindall was a "rescuer", and the police owed no duty to rescuers.
The police acted irrationally in failing to grit the road.
The police had sufficient control over the patch of ice to give rise to a duty.
There was no communication that could trigger an assumption of responsibility.
The police created a new hazard by attending and then leaving the scene.
Get Unlimited Answers To Exam Questions - Install Crowdly Extension Now!