How did the court in Spies v Smith 1957 (1) SA 539 (A)
address the burden of proof
for undue influence?

Question

How did the court in  Spies v Smith   1957 (1) SA 539 (A)
 address the burden of proof
for undue influence?

Answer

The court held that the burden was on the Master of the High Court to
investigate the influence exerted.

Answer

The court held that the burden was on the
plaintiff to prove that undue influence destroyed free will.

Answer

The court held that the burden was shared equally between both parties.

Answer

The court held that the burden was on the defendant to prove that no
influence was exerted.

Crowdly