✅ The verified answer to this question is available below. Our community-reviewed solutions help you understand the material better.
[This case was adapted from CFA Institute, Ethics in Practice Casebook]
Wang is president and CEO of Royal Capital Investment Group (RCIG), an investment adviser business that is owned by Royal Capital Bank. RCIG uses the Bank’s 32 branch office network to operate. A client of the Bank that is a long-time customer and Wang’s personal friend and friend of other Bank board members opened an investment account with stated investment objectives for its income. While the customer did make a few investment transactions over the year, the bulk of transactions involved hundreds of money transfers amounting to $95 million in deposits and $79 million in withdrawals.
The transactions included transfers to and from entities and persons located in countries or banks identified by the government regulator as having significant money laundering risk. Furthermore, Wang came to know that the customer engaged in certain types of international activities that are easily tainted by corruption and bribery. But because of the customer’s longstanding relationship with the Bank, Wang presumed the transactions to be legitimate. Wang even approved the daily Anti-Money Laundering reports that would have triggered suspicious activities including accepting vague transaction descriptions such as “fees collected for services provided”, “commissions for work done”, or “consultancy fees” without further investigation. Wang’s actions are