In the study by Hertwig et al. (2008) about the introduction of a tobacco tax, which pattern of responses was interpreted as providing evidence against the standard interpretation of the conjunction fallacy?

Question

Answer

Participants who rated X&Y as more likely than X subsequently endorsed “X&Y” as their interpretation of the original statement.

Answer

Participants who rated X&Y as more likely than X subsequently endorsed “X and X is the cause for Y” as their interpretation of the original statement.

Answer

Participants who rated X as more likely than X&Y endorsed “X&Y” as their interpretation of the original statement.

Answer

Participants who rated X as more likely than X&Y endorsed subsequently endorsed “X and X is the cause for Y” as their interpretation of the original statement.

Crowdly

In the study by Hertwig et al. (2008) about the introduction of a tobacco tax, w...

Want instant access to all verified answers on moodle.telt.unsw.edu.au?