As you hopefully recall, broken access control was at the top of the OWASP Top 10. An authorization framework is not a magic bullet, e.g., you may still leave resources with Insecure Direct Object Reference and broken access control also includes to code injection and low-level code vulnerabilities.

But there are benefits to using a framework like Cedar, which is part of a more pro-active approach to security. If we consider the OWASP recommendations for pro-active controls, "C1: Implement Access Control", which of the recommendation does using a language like Cedar contribute to?