Is a strictly causal positive PIDz (digital proportional, "integral" and "derivative") controller (plus unit negative feedback) able to control your plant?

Question

Answer

No, the controller C(z) would be too expensive

Answer

No, the controller C(z) would need to supply outputs physically impossible for this system

Answer

Yes, for the adequate placement and gain, this controller is able to obtain an automatic control system T(z) stable, precise enough and with both acceptable response speed and small enough (or zero) oscillations

Answer

No, the controller C(z) would be unstable

Answer

The control system is not perfect but is the best I could find, so I have to accept it

Answer

Partially, the complete control system T(z) is stable but precision is bad

Answer

Partially, the complete control system T(z) is stable and precise to step, but the system is too oscillatory (or with too much overshoot)

Answer

No, the controller C(z) would be noncausal

Answer

No, the controller C(z) would be absolutely unstable

Answer

No, the stability range for the complete control system T(z) is too narrow, unattainable in real life

Answer

No, the resulting control system T(z) would be unstable for every gain

Answer

No, the resulting control system T(z) would be noncausal

Answer

Partially, the complete control system T(z) is stable and precise to step, but the system is too slow (and oscillatory)

Crowdly

Is a strictly causal positive PIDz (digital proportional, "integral" and "deriva...

Want instant access to all verified answers on atenea.upc.edu?