Two organisations both operate in regions with moderate grid variability (150 to 400 gCO₂e/kWh). Organisation A processes 12,000 batch jobs daily with annual compute energy of 800,000 kilowatt-hours. Organisation B processes 15 batch jobs daily with annual compute energy of 3,000 kilowatt-hours. Both would require approximately 6 weeks of engineering effort to implement carbon-aware scheduling. For which organisation is the investment more justified, and why?

Question

Accepted Answer

Organisation A, because the fixed engineering cost is spread across a much larger volume of flexible compute, producing substantially more total carbon savings per unit of investment

Answer

Both organisations equally, because the engineering effort is the same

Answer

Organisation B, because smaller organisations have a greater responsibility to reduce emissions

Answer

Neither organisation, because carbon-aware scheduling only works for hyperscale cloud providers

Crowdly

Two organisations both operate in regions with moderate grid variability (150 to...

Want instant access to all verified answers on moodle.polytechnic.bh?