A logistics company's HR team wants to reduce discrimination risk in its appraisal process. It trains raters on EEO and common errors, documents ratings thoroughly, and ensures criteria are job-related, but does not review whether the same standards are applied consistently across different managers. A board member claims 'the steps taken so far are sufficient on their own.' Which evaluation BEST addresses this claim using the lecture's concepts?

Question

Accepted Answer

This is inaccurate: the lecture also emphasises ensuring consistent standards across all employees as a distinct requirement for fairness

Answer

This is accurate, since the lecture states cross-manager consistency is not relevant to discrimination risk in appraisal

Answer

This is accurate: rater training, documentation, and job-related criteria alone are sufficient regardless of cross-manager consistency

Answer

This is inaccurate only because consistency across managers is not discussed anywhere in the lecture's appraisal content

Crowdly

A logistics company's HR team wants to reduce discrimination risk in its apprais...

Want instant access to all verified answers on moodle.pia.edu.au?