In Fagan v Metropolitan Commissioner of Police , Bridge J dissented on the basis that:

Question

In  Fagan v Metropolitan Commissioner of Police , Bridge J dissented on the basis that:

Answer

the accused only intended to
apply force after they parked their vehicle on the victim’s foot.

Answer

the vehicle was not under the
control of the offender when he parked his vehicle on the victim’s foot.

Answer

the accused's unlawful act was a continuing act.

Answer

the act of driving their
vehicle on top of the victim’s foot was not willed by the accused.

Crowdly