✅ The verified answer to this question is available below. Our community-reviewed solutions help you understand the material better.
X, a notorious drunkard, whilst walking to a wedding ceremony witnesses Y fiddling with his neighbor’s kraal. To his amazement, he realizes that Y is leading the cattle out of the kraal and away from the property. Two weeks later, X arrives drunk at the traditional court to give evidence of the theft he witnessed. According to the principles of the traditional court, should X be allowed to give evidence?