✅ The verified answer to this question is available below. Our community-reviewed solutions help you understand the material better.
Zephyr Power Limited (Zephyr) is a company primarily engaged in developing wind power plants. It was employed (contracted) by Suzlon Energy Private Limited (Suzlon) to develop the second largest Wind Park in Jaisalmer, with a capacity of 1,864MW. Zephyr commissioned Apex Solutions Private Limited (Apex) to perform key stages in setting up Wind Park in Jaisalmer, such as site selection and preparation, foundation construction, tower installation, turbine assembly and installation, blade installation, and grid connection. A fully functional Wind Park was to be handed over to Zephyr.
The entire value of the contract between Zephyr and Apex for setting up Wind Park in Jaisalmer was Rs. 500 Crore. The contract provided a date by which a fully completed and functional Wind Park was to be handed over by Apex to Zephyr.
Twenty five days were passed the delivery date. Apex had not even started work on the project. Apex declared to Zephyr that it would not be able to perform the contract as it did not have the skill and resources to do the work. Zephyr accepted the anticipatory breach by Apex and terminated the contract. Zephyr awarded the contract to another party for a contract value of 550 crores.
Zephyr sought to recover the damages from Apex. The contract Zephyr had with Apex had the following clauses on damages:
Clause 201.1. Apex shall be liable to Zephyr for any damage suffered by Zephyr as a consequence of Apex’s breach of contract.
Clause 201.2. If Apex fails to deliver a fully functional Wind Park within the time specified, Apex shall be liable to pay damages at the rate of 0.1% of the total contract value per day of delay in delivery of a fully completed and functional Wind Park.
Zephyr calculated its damages under the two clauses as follows:
1. Under clause 201.1: Rs. 50 crores
2. Under clause 201.2: Rs. 500 crores x 0.1% x 25 days = Rs. 12.5 crores
Zephyr claimed both the amounts in damages from Apex. Apex contends that Clause 201.2 applies for ‘delay in delivery of a fully functional Wind Park.’ As there was no delivery, the question of paying under clause 201.2 did not arise. Will clause 201.2 apply to the undelivered functional Wind Park?