A national scholarship programme
disproportionately benefited students from elite urban schools because
selection relied heavily on examination performance. Which critique is MOST
valid?

Question

Answer

When
opportunities are unequal, merit systems have the potential to perpetuate
structural inequality.

Answer

Scholarships purposefully worsen rural marginalisation.

Answer

Exam
results have nothing to do with access to education.

Answer

Higher
education should inevitably be dominated by urban students.

Crowdly

A national scholarship programme disproportionately benefited students from eli...

Want instant access to all verified answers on caes.myexams.unisa.ac.za?