In the GCHQ case Robert Alexander QC for the government submitted to the court that, “There is material showing that the prerogative is in general unreviewable, and that casts considerable doubt on whether it is at all reviewable.”
Which statement below most accurately reflects the judgments of the House of Lords?

Question

In the GCHQ case Robert Alexander QC for the government submitted to the court that, “There is material showing that the prerogative is in general unreviewable, and that casts considerable doubt on whether it is at all reviewable.” 
 Which statement below most accurately reflects the judgments of the House of Lords?

Answer

The prerogative was unreviewable because ministers were accountable to Parliament

Answer

All prerogatives should be reviewable regardless of subject matter

Answer

The source of the power did not determine the reviewability of the prerogative

Crowdly

In the GCHQ case Robert Alexander QC for the government submitted to the court t...

Want instant access to all verified answers on moodle.kent.ac.uk?