✅ The verified answer to this question is available below. Our community-reviewed solutions help you understand the material better.
Rangarajan is an entrepreneur in the digital media industry, he operated his business through, Moon Networks Limited (MNL). Rangarajan wanted to expand the business activities of MNL and for this he needed investment of about Rs 5 crore. He identified Mariam Equity Fund Limited, a Delhi based venture capital fund, as a potential source of investment. Mariam was interested but required MNL to meet certain conditions and standards. Rangarajan identified Hindustan Business Finance (HBF) which could give MNL a short-term loan. The HBF agreed to give a loan only if Mr. Rangarajan give a personal guarantee. Towards this, Rangarajan signed various documents including the Personal Guarantee and Indemnity, and Corporate Guarantee.
The relevant terms of the Personal Guarantee and Indemnity are as follows:
Clause 203: Advances: "The Loan shall be drawn down in a single sum as soon as this agreement has been signed."
Clause 204: Indemnity and Guarantee: “I, Rangarajan shall not indemnify and hold you harmless against the Loss and Cost that you may suffer or incur by reason of failure of the Borrower [MNL] to comply with the term of the Agreement”.My liability will arise on breach/default by MNL.
Clause 205: Declaration: I agree that my liability hereunder shall be affected by:
i. any indulgence granted or made by you to or with the Borrower or any Co-surety.
ii. any variation to the Agreement and/or to any other document executed by any person in connection therewith.
iii. any invalidity, illegality, unenforceability, irregularity or frustration of any actual or purported obligation of, or security held from, the Borrower or any other person.
The MNL availed the loan of Rs. 1 crore from HBF on two instalments. When MNL defaulted on repayment, HBF pursued Rangarajan under the personal guarantee and indemnity. Rangarajan argued his liability was secondary to MNL’s and that the sums disbursed weren’t a valid loan.
Parties are in dispute as to liability on repayment of loan.