Crowdly
Add to Chrome
Questions Bank (1381484 total)
В якому рядку всі слова – архаїзми
Utilizând virtualizarea, o organizație a redus costurile lunare de energie și de răcire. De care avantaj al virtualizării a beneficiat organizația?
Discussion
This is where you discuss and give meaning to the results. You should also detail any experimental errors and make any other relevant comments about the experiment. Include possible improvements. Ensure you are not re-stating the method.
Discussion points to consider: (Note: The points below are not intended as questions! They are here to give guidance on what to include in your discussion. Do not simply list answers - incorporate them into a full discussion.)
- Can you explain your observations based on the chemical reaction?
- After completing the calibration curves, was any additional data required in order to determine the composition? If so, what was that data, and why was it required?
- What composition of the baking powder would you suggest that Monash University produces to result in the best cake (if we were to assume that the more gas produced, the more the cake will rise)? Can you explain your answer using experimental results and the chemical equation?
- What factors may have affected the final result? What are some sources of error that may have been encountered, and how would they have impacted on the results?
Discussion marking rubric:
| 0 | 1 | 2 |
Relates results to aims. | Interpretation of results not related back to original experimental aims. | Results partially related back to original experimental aims. | Key results interpreted in relation to experimental aims. |
Discussion and interpretation of results. | No interpretation or comparison of results is made. No discussion points are addressed. | Some interpretation or comparison of results is made. Some discussion points are addressed. | Key findings are summarised. Results are interpreted. Results are compared to expected/predicted values. All discussion points are addressed. |
Actual data used to validate statements. | No experimental data used to justify scientific statements/claims. Multiple scientific errors are present. | Some experimental data used to justify scientific statements/claims. Some scientific errors are present. | Experimental data used to justify all scientific statements/claims. The science is correct. |
Factors affecting results discussed. | No errors were raised or were only non-scientific/experimental errors raised. | Only some errors raised or several non-scientific/experimental errors were raised. The impact of the errors was not discussed. | Multiple errors/factors are raised and are scientific/experimental in nature (i.e. NOT human error). The impact of the errors was discussed. |
Writing Style | Many grammatical/spelling/scientific writing errors were noted, and/or discussion was over 300 words in length. | Some grammatical/spelling/scientific writing errors were noted. | The discussion was free of grammatical and spelling errors, was written in the past tense, used full sentences and a passive voice, and was within 300 words. |
Word limit: 300 (± 10%) words.
For guidance on writing a meaningful discussion, please refer to the following resources:
- SoC: Undergraduate Student Handbook
- RLO: Writing a Science Lab Report
- RLO: Writing for Assignments
Which of the following represents the total amount of exchangeable air?
Victor is a marketing manager at a large fresh produce organisation in Gauteng. He can interact well with other people and is seen as a people’s person. He can function successfully in a group as a leader as well as a mediator. Which of the following leadership skills does Victor portray?
The amount of air that can be inspired above the tidal volume is called the:
During a physical examination, Joe learns that his resting tidal volume is 500 ml; his average resting respiratory rate is 12 breaths per minute; his total lung capacity is 6000 ml; and his anatomic dead space is 150 ml. Joe's resting alveolar ventilation is:
Kate Austin is a lecturer at NWU, during her performance appraisal meeting with her manager, she is informed of a complaint against her from one of her students. The student has complained that Kate does not reply to any of his emails and this is not fulfilling her role as a lecturer. On hearing this, Kate immediately asks for evidence to support the complaint. Her manager is unable to present any. Which component of the performance management process did Kate’s manager overlook in the above scenario?