No, a linear logic story can be presented according to a theme.

No, linear logic does not require any specific order.

Yes, linear logic requires a chronological flow.

by telling your story to someone that makes it feel like it is their own story

by telling your story to someone in a way that shows how meaningful it is to you

by telling a story based on someone else's personal data

Present as much data as possible.

Weave in neutral words with the data.

Use neutral words without boring them with data.

Go year-by-year, telling the story of why sales changed, such as a new product introduction or an increase in customer returns.

Point out years that sales revenue increased as well as the years that it decreased, so the managers can make sense of the chart.

Give the audience a few moments to view the chart, and then ask for their opinions on why revenue fluctuated for those years.

Humans cannot do more than one thing at a time.

Humans desire every story to have an ending.

Humans need a specific structure to stories.

It will help him overcome the fear of presenting to a group of strangers.

It will help him create a concise flow from his topic to the conclusion.

It will help him create a flow upward, step-by-step, from introduction to conclusion.

They introduce and then resolve anxiety.

They avoid inducing anxiety.

They tell how anxiety can be dangerous.

The way Dana analyzes the data must have the same comparison methodology.

Both sets of data must be compiled from the same source at the same time.

The methodologies in gathering both sets of data must be comparable.

Hand-drawing is faster than using computer programs.

You can keep copies of discarded ideas and come back to them later.

The purpose of sketching is trial and error, which can be better done by hand.

Eye candy cannot be used to highlight an element that moves in the visualization.

Eye candy should be limited to data that is not included in the visualization.

Eye candy must add to the value of what she is communicating.