LAW1111 - Foundations of law - S1 2025
Шукаєте відповіді та рішення тестів для LAW1111 - Foundations of law - S1 2025? Перегляньте нашу велику колекцію перевірених відповідей для LAW1111 - Foundations of law - S1 2025 в learning.monash.edu.
Отримайте миттєвий доступ до точних відповідей та детальних пояснень для питань вашого курсу. Наша платформа, створена спільнотою, допомагає студентам досягати успіху!
Which of the following acts did not affect the ability of State Courts to appeal to the Privy Council on matters of State jurisdiction but abolished appeals from the High Court to the Privy Council?
Your client has been arguing with his next door neighbour about repairing the fence that divides their properties. Attempts to resolve the dispute without resorting to lawyers have failed. Your client seeks the amount of $2500 contribution to the cost of rebuilding the fence. The BEST course of action that you can take next for your client would be:
The Yoorok Justice Commission is....
Helen, a barrister, is appearing for a client in the Magistrates’ Court at Ringwood. She has read two important cases which relate to her client’s matter, but the rationes contradict each other. One decision is from the County Court of Victoria in 1972, the other decision is from the Supreme Court of South Australia in 2003. Should she argue that the Magistrates’ Court at Ringwood must:
Australia’s system of State and Commonwealth parliaments is BEST described as:
Critical Legal Studies...
Section 234 of the Road Traffic Act 2010 (Vic) authorised the Governor in Council to make regulations with respect to any matter that by this Act is required or permitted to be prescribed or that is necessary or convenient for carrying out or giving effect to this Act. The (Vic) came into effect on 3 March 2018. On 30 June 2024, section 234 of the Road Traffic Rules 2018
The Court of Appeal in Victoria has a case before it. For this case, the Court comprises of four judges, but they are equally divided in their decision. Which of the following will occur?
After the decision in Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175CLR 1, if a group of First Nations peoples could show that they had continued to exercise traditional rights over land since before British colonisation, Australian law would recognise those traditional rights. But those rights could be
Хочете миттєвий доступ до всіх перевірених відповідей на learning.monash.edu?
Отримайте необмежений доступ до відповідей на екзаменаційні питання - встановіть розширення Crowdly зараз!