Шукаєте відповіді та рішення тестів для English phonetics and phonology (2024–2025) (1BA/02) (Michalski)? Перегляньте нашу велику колекцію перевірених відповідей для English phonetics and phonology (2024–2025) (1BA/02) (Michalski) в lms.amu.edu.pl.
Отримайте миттєвий доступ до точних відповідей та детальних пояснень для питань вашого курсу. Наша платформа, створена спільнотою, допомагає студентам досягати успіху!
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈmɑːskt || ˈmæskt/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈnwɑː/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/reˈhɜːs || reˈhɝːs/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈpɔːh/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈnjuː/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈbæhstə || ˈbæhstɚ/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈkraɪm/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈnpɪŋ/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈtɑːsk || ˈtæsk/
Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.
If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”
If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.
/ˈne.ɒn || ne.ɑːn/