In Nydam v R the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria explained that the mens rea for criminal negligence requires that:

Question

In  Nydam v R  the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria explained that the   mens rea   for criminal negligence requires that:

Answer

the accused’s conduct fell grossly
short of the standard required by their duty of care.

Answer

the accused understood that
they owed a duty of care to the victim.

Answer

a reasonable person would
have foreseen that their conduct would probably kill or seriously injure the
victim.

Answer

a reasonable person would have known that their
conduct was a gross falling short of the standard required by their duty of
care.

Crowdly