What implication did Kirsten v Bailey 1976 (4) SA 108 (C) have for freedom of testation in South African succession law?

Question

What implication did  Kirsten v Bailey   1976 (4) SA 108 (C)  have for freedom of testation in South African succession law?

Answer

It limited testamentary freedom to exclude non-family beneficiaries.

Answer

It required all wills to be notarised to prevent influence.

Answer

It mandated court approval for wills with significant bequests.

Answer

It reinforced that testamentary freedom requires
a free and voluntary act.

Crowdly