The Constitutional Court case of Du Plessis v De Klerk 1996 (3) SA 850 (CC) laid important principle regarding the direct and indirect application of the Bill of Rights. Choose the incorrect statement:-

Question

Accepted Answer

The development of the common law was a constitutional matter and therefore remained within the jurisdiction of the court that had overseen the development of the common law for the past century, which is Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.

Answer

The Bill of Rights in the interim Constitution conformed to this traditional model in so far as it had no direct application to disputes between private litigants governed by the common law.

Answer

The court’s conclusion that the Constitution distinguished between direct and indirect application of the Bill of Rights was bolstered by the close fit between this distinction and the ‘two-track jurisdictional scheme of the interim Constitution.

Answer

The court further decided an important jurisdictional issue.

Crowdly

The Constitutional Court case of Du Plessis v De Klerk 1996 (3) SA 850 (CC) laid...

Хочете миттєвий доступ до всіх перевірених відповідей на mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za?