Focus on Infant mortality rate and consider α=0.10.
The Margin of Error for μ
The previous model was modified:
(the same sample was considered)
What are your conclusions using a 0.10 level of significance ?
Still about this model (and using the same sample)
regarding Ho: β1=0 (considering α=0.05 if needed), the test statistic was computed: t=-5.02.β1 estimate is
Income Group was considered as explanatory (as dummy variables):
(the same sample was considered)
What are your conclusions using a 0.10 level of significance ?
This model was considered to investigate if Infant mortality rate (IMR) is GDP per capita (GDP) related:
.
Using the sample described in the beginning of the Exam, the coefficient of correlation was computed and found to be -0.674.
Ho: R2=0 was tested.
The p-value is
Modify the original observed frequency table considering only 3 Regions and 2 Income Groups
What are your conclusions, if you run a Contingency Analysis, using α=0.05 ?
The 3 countries from Middle East & North Africa and the 2 from South Asia were grouped together in the same region (Middle East & North Africa & South Asia) and the Contingency Analysis was run.The test statistic (Q) is reliable and was found to be equal to 13.2.
The p-value is
The expected number (if Ho is true) of Low Income countries in South Asia is
Is GDP per capita region related ?
Only 5 regions were considered (the country from Latin America & Caribbean was excluded from the sample) and GDP per capita mean values and confidence intervals were computed and plotted in this graph:
If you run an ANOVA (and the assumptions are met) what is your expectation for the p-value?