Питання | Сторінка 116469

In the study by Hertwig et al. (2008) about the introduction of a tobacco tax, which pattern of responses was interpreted as providing evidence against the standard interpretation of the conjunction fallacy?

Participants who rated X&Y as more likely than X subsequently endorsed “X&Y” as their interpretation of the original statement.

Participants who rated X&Y as more likely than X subsequently endorsed “X and X is the cause for Y” as their interpretation of the original statement.

Participants who rated X as more likely than X&Y endorsed “X&Y” as their interpretation of the original statement.

Participants who rated X as more likely than X&Y endorsed subsequently endorsed “X and X is the cause for Y” as their interpretation of the original statement.

Переглянути це питання

Crowdly

Questions Bank (1241738 total)