Wouldn't it be better then to not standardize the features? Our PCA must be really good if such a high percentage of total variance is explained. Or is there maybe more to it? Discuss the reason for this significant difference when not using standardization. What effect do we see here?

Hint: for your explanation, check the statistical summary of the features.

Compare the standardized 2D and 3D PCA plots using all 30 features. Rotate the 3D plot to at least two substantially different viewpoints. Keep the data, target and preprocessing unchanged.

Discuss briefly the differences that you can observe between the 2D and the 3D PCA:

• Given the explained variance of 2D PCA vs 3D PCA, in your opinion, is adding a third component worth it? Does it make it easier to distinguish samples?
• Describe a concrete region in the 2D/3D PCA. Does going to three dimensions facilitate group separation between the Benign and Malignant samples?
• If you had to discuss the data set and present it to your colleagues, which PCA would you choose?

Attach three images: the 2D plot and the same 3D projection from two different viewpoints.

Compare the standardized and unstandardized 2D PCA results. Consider both the variance percentages and the class colours.

Someone concludes: "The unstandardized representation is necessarily better for this assignment because it retains almost 100%." Which response is best justified?

Inspect the standardized t-SNE plot with perplexity 30 and compare it with the standardized PCA plot. The app uses the diagnosis labels for colouring after calculating each projection.

Which statement about this comparison is justified?

State the exact printed output and describe what the program calculates. [2 marks] 

A student changes the loop to: 

while current <= 7: 

    if current % 2 == 0: 

        continue 

    total = total + current 

    current = current + 1 

The initial values are still current = 1 and total = 0. 

Explain why this version never reaches the print statement. State the values of current and total once the program becomes stuck. [2 marks] 

Return to the original program. Suppose only the increment is changed to: 

current = current + 2 

Would the final output change? Explain your answer by describing which values of current are processed. [2 marks] 

A kültéri védelemben passzív infra mozgáséezékelőt nem használunk.

Consider: 

current = 1 

total = 0 

while current <= 7: 

    if current % 2 != 0: 

        total = total + current 

    current = current + 1 

print("Total:", total) 

Complete the table. Record total at the end of the iteration that processes the stated value of current. [2 marks]