Traditionally, the South African rules of statutory interpretation were based on?
In S v Zuma 1995 (2) SA 642 (CC) it was laid down that ...?
In Bezuidenhout v Mutual Insurance Ltd 1987 (1) SA 703 (A) the court held the following:
One of the reasons for legislative intervention into the common law is that:
In which case did the court set aside a conviction of an accused that was found guilty of driving a vehicle that was pushed by a group of people without a driver's license because the court consulted the dictionary to find the meaning of the word "drive"?
In which case did the Constitutional Court confirm that the adoption of the purposive approach in our law has rendered obsolete all the previous attempts to determine whether a statutory provision is directory or peremptory on the basis of the wording and subject of the text of the provision?
What does section 39 of the Constitution provide?
In terms of section 229 of the interim Constitution all?
In which case did the court decide that a security official who contravenes a statutory provision when acting outside the scope of his duties cannot rely on the presumption against the state being bound?
In the case of Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W) it was held that?