No

Yes

In this case, p-value < α, so we cannot reject H₀, and conclude that fraud is more likely if the car was reported as driveable after the accident.

In this case, p-value/2 < α, so we reject H₀, and conclude that fraud is more likely if the car was reported as driveable after the accident.

In this case, p-value/2 < α, so we cannot reject H₀, and conclude that fraud is more likely if the car was reported as driveable after the accident.

In this case, p-value < α, so we reject H₀, and conclude that fraud is more likely if the car was reported as driveable after the accident.

The probability of a claim being fraudulent if the car was driveable after the accident is estimated to be 0.1124 more than if the car was not driveable.

The probability of a claim being fraudulent if the car was driveable after the accident is estimated to be 0.1124.

The probability of a claim being fraudulent if the car was not driveable after the accident is estimated to be 0.1124 more than if the car was driveable.

The probability of a claim being fraudulent if the car was not driveable after the accident is estimated to be 0.1124.

The probability of a claim being fraudulent if the car was not driveable after the accident is estimated to be 0.1013.

The probability of a claim being fraudulent if the car was driveable after the accident is estimated to be 0.1013.

The probability of a claim being fraudulent if the car was not driveable after the accident is estimated to be 0.1013 more than if the car was driveable.

The probability of a claim being fraudulent if the car was driveable after the accident is estimated to be 0.1013 more than if the car was not driveable.