1.0

not enough information to calculate

0.17

0.0

0.5

system 1 is an old brain system like a 

reflex arc while system 2 is a formal reasoning system

system 1 is fast while system 2 is associative

system 1 is a formal reasoning system and system

2 is an old brain system like a reflex arc

system 1 is conceptual while system 2 is formal

none of these

all of these

it is intuitive

it relies upon breaking down goals into subgoals, until such time as we have operators to solve subgoals and then moves up via recursion to solve higher subgoals/goals.

it was used by GPS (General Problem Solver)

it can be applied to any problem

causation only seems to explain certain types of

inductive inferences

all of these

there are many different types of causation so

it is difficult to know exactly which type is being referred to in the

explanation of inductive inference

causation itself must be justified by a principle of uniformity that

itself can only be established via an inductive inference

none of these

Tversky and Kahneman, heuristics

Simon, optimization

Gigerenzer, probability theory

Laplace, rationality

none of these

EEG

CAT

fMRI

PET

They all provide the same temporal resolution

universal, valid

universal, negative

particular, affirmative

universal, affirmative

none of these

simple effect

one way interaction

cross over interaction

main effect with interaction

main effect

watching

the behaviours of grey goose goslings and male stickleback fish

realizing

the importance of habituation and associative learning

none

of these

all

of these

the animal wants/needs to engage in the behaviour and that the origin of

behaviour is endogenous

it is a universal affirmative argument

the logical form

all living things are mortal

it is a deductive argument

Socrates died by poison