No one has a right to life.

It is not reasonable to say that if people have not taken every possible precaution against pregnancy, the unborn person has a right to the mother's body.

We all ought to do the minimally decent thing when that minimally decent thing does not require much effort from us.

The fact that someone has a right to life doesn't show that they have a right to someone else's body.

Marquis argues that a pregnant woman has the right and that it sometimes trumps the rights of the fetus

Marquis argues that while a pregnant woman has this right, it is trumped by the fetus' right to life

Marquis argues that while a pregnant woman has this right, the right isn't morally relevant

Marquis doesn't consider this right

Marquis says that Thomson needs to address the issue of whether a fetus is a person

Marquis says that Thomson's violinist analogy can only be applied to cases of rape, and isn't applicable to abortion in the case of consensual sex

Marquis says that Thomson doesn't properly address the distinction between killing and letting die

Marquis doesn't say anything about Thomson's argument

Marquis says that Thomson's argument is successful in showing that abortion is sometimes permissible

Even if we grant that the fetus is a person, abortion is sometimes morally acceptable. 

Abortion is always permissible, because the fetus is not a person and has no right to life

The fetus becomes a person at 12 weeks gestation, which is why abortion past that point is always wrong

The fetus is a person from the moment of conception, which is why abortion is always wrong

Abortion is always wrong because the fetus is a person with a right to life

Because killers must have evil in their hearts, while letting people die

doesn’t require evil

Because the drugs used for lethal injections are not made of natural

ingredients

Because we are conscious of our natural goal of survival, and active

euthanasia requires us to go against our own nature

Because no animals use active euthanasia

Because humans have historically never used active euthanasia

Is the only true euthanasia because active euthanasia is a mistaken

concept

Is a mistaken concept because there is no intentional killing when a

doctor lets a patient die, so it can’t be a form of euthanasia

Is the only true euthanasia because it is the only mercy killing

Is a mistaken concept because letting a patient die is morally

equivalent to killing them

The debate about whether it should be permissible

They both decided to kill their nephews for revenge

They intend for the patient to die

They intend to reduce suffering, indignities, and financial burdens for

the patient or their family

They intend to discreetly circumvent the law

They intend to comply with the law