Voting can lead to preference cycling or paradoxes, while financial markets tend to stabilize around equilibrium prices. 

Financial markets cannot incorporate future expectations, while voting can.

Voting fully reflects information asymmetries, whereas financial markets do not.

Voting systems always ensure efficient allocation of resources, unlike financial markets.

Voting processes are designed to reflect risk preferences, while financial markets ignore them.

Financial markets aggregate preferences only at the end of each fiscal year, while voting is continuous.

Financial markets always result in more democratic outcomes than voting.

In financial markets, the intensity of preferences is reflected through prices and quantities traded, while in voting, each participant has typically one vote regardless of intensity.

1980

1200

1240

1220

10

9.83

9.55

10.5

10.13

400

200

600

120

10

9.83

9.55

10.5

10.13

Yes 👍​

No 👎​