Шукаєте відповіді та рішення тестів для MCB2011 - Molecular biology and the cell - S1 2026? Перегляньте нашу велику колекцію перевірених відповідей для MCB2011 - Molecular biology and the cell - S1 2026 в learning.monash.edu.
Отримайте миттєвий доступ до точних відповідей та детальних пояснень для питань вашого курсу. Наша платформа, створена спільнотою, допомагає студентам досягати успіху!
The ecologists used a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay to investigate the abundance of the novel organism in several different ecological niches including hydrothermal vents, deep-sea sediments and shallow coastal waters. The qPCR assay was performed using a primer that specifically targeted a gene carried by the novel organism.
Examine the qPCR results shown above. Which ecological niche (hydrothermal vents, deep-sea sediments, shallow coastal waters) had the highest abundance of the novel organism? Briefly explain how you reached this conclusion. (2-3 sentences) (2 marks)
The ACTC1 gene encodes an actin protein that is only expressed in cardiomyocytes (i.e. cardiac muscle cells). The schematic below shows the histone modifications that are present in the promoter region in cardiomyocytes vs fibroblasts (i.e. skin cells).
Use the information provided above to explain why the gene is actively expressed in cardiomyocytes but not fibroblasts. (2-3 sentences) (2 marks)
The ACTB gene encodes an actin protein that is ubiquitously expressed in all human cells. As shown in the schematic below, the promoter region of the gene is embedded within a CG island.
The researcher uses a specialised laboratory technique to examine DNA methylation in the promoter region. What do you hypothesise the researcher will find? (1 mark)
Q5. Concisely describe the patient’s sequence variant in a format suitable for the results section of a scientific report. Your answer must include the gene name, reference sequence accession number, correct DNA-level and protein-level notation, and appropriate gene and protein nomenclature.
A sequence variant was identified in exon 14 of the patient's
Q3. How would you classify the patient's sequence variant at the DNA level?
Q4. How would you classify the patient's sequence variant at the protein-coding level? (1 mark)
Q2. In the week three applied activities, you performed a pairwise sequence alignment between the patient’s DNA sequencing results and the MFN2 reference sequence (NG_007945.1). Upload a screenshot of your pairwise sequence alignment output from Clustal Omega to the file upload box.
In the week two
laboratory class, you set-up three polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reactions. Complete
the steps below (A-D) to upload and interpret your PCR results.
A) PCR RESULTS UPLOAD: Upload the agarose gel image of your PCR results to the file upload box. Record which gel lanes correspond to your experimental reaction, positive control reaction and negative control reaction in the provided table.
B) NEGATIVE CONTROL REACTION
The expected outcome for the negative control reaction is no visible DNA bands.
i) Did you observe any visible bands in your negative control? (YES/NO) (1 mark)
If NO, proceed to the next question (ii). If YES, explain whether or not you can have confidence in the results obtained for the positive control reaction and experimental reaction. In your answer, consider what the size and appearance of the observed band(s) may indicate.
C) POSITIVE CONTROL REACTION
The expected outcome for the positive control reaction is a single DNA band at 187 bp.
ii) Did your positive control produce a band of the expected size? (YES/NO) (1 mark)
If YES, proceed to the next question (iii). If NO, suggest one or more sources of error or procedural issues that could have resulted in failed amplification of the target sequence.
iii) Did your positive control produce an additional band(s) at unexpected sizes? (YES/NO) (1 mark)
If NO, proceed to the next question (iv). If YES, explain whether or not these bands represent non-specific amplification. If they do represent non-specific amplification, suggest one or more adjustments to the reaction mix or thermal cycling conditions that could improve the specificity of the PCR.
D) EXPERIMENTAL REACTION
The expected outcome for the experimental reaction is a single DNA band at 187 bp.
iv) Did your experimental reaction produce a band of the expected size? (YES/NO) (1 mark)
If YES, proceed to the next question (v). If NO, suggest one or more sources of error or procedural issues that could have resulted in failed amplification of the target sequence.
v ) Did your experimental reaction produce an additional band(s) at unexpected sizes? (YES/NO) (1 mark)
If NO, proceed to the next quiz question. If YES, explain whether or not these bands represent non-specific amplification. If they do represent non-specific amplification, suggest one or more adjustments to the reaction mix or thermal cycling conditions that could improve the specificity of the PCR.
Which of the following reagents is suspected of causing genetic defects? (select all that apply)
Guanidine hydrochloride (CW No. 8793256) is a component of the binding buffer. Which of the following hazard statements are listed in the mini SDS for this reagent? (select all that apply)