Crowdly

Додати до Chrome

Questions Bank (1450052 total)

What information would you find in your subject outline? (You can select more than 1 answer)

Weekly topics and assessment details for the subject

✅

Your Subject Coordinator's contact details

✅

Essential and recommended readings

✅

Your lecture slides

Learning outcomes

✅

Переглянути це питання

Which of the following best describes academic writing?

It is creative, opinion-based, and written in any point of view

It is informal, personal, and written in the first person

It is persuasive, emotional, and written in the second person

It is formal, objective, and usually written in the third person

✅

Переглянути це питання

Which of the following best describes a major risk of relying on generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) tools for academic work?

Gen AI guarantees user privacy, but it may struggle to generate creative original content

Gen AI may fabricate convincing but incorrect information and built in content restrictions can introduce bias

✅

Gen AI prevents all forms of bias by banning certain words, and it never collects or stores user data

Gen AI provides fully reliable information, but the tools can be difficult to use and it might slow down research.

Переглянути це питання

You are in a computer science course. You are required to write some code for an assessment. The assessment instructions state that gen AI SHOULD NOT be used. But you use Copilot to generate the code, make some changes to it and then cite Copilot correctly before submitting it. Is this academic misconduct?

Yes, using gen AI tools to derive and submit responses to assignment questions in place of your own work is a form of plagiarism and considered to be a form of academic misconduct.

✅

No, you have made some changes to the code and also cited where you got the information from.

Переглянути це питання

A student is completing an online open-book exam at home. They are struggling with one of the questions, so they enter the question into a gen AI tool and submit the AI-generated answer as their own. Is this academic misconduct?

No. The exam was open book, so the student can use whatever resources they want, including gen AI tools.

Yes. Using a gen AI tool in an assessment unless it is specifically permitted by the Subject Coordinator is considered misconduct.

✅

Переглянути це питання

A student uses Copilot, a gen AI tool, to generate the introduction of their major essay without acknowledgement,. They write the rest of the assessment themselves. The subject outline states that students must not use genAI for the assessment. What kind of academic misconduct is this?

Obstruction and Inteference

Misuse of genAI

✅

Cheating

Collusion and Facilitation

Переглянути це питання

Two students are in different tutorials for the same subject. One student hasn’t had time to complete their assessment task, and asks the other for help. The second student shares their essay, and the first copies it and submits it as their own. What are the potential consequences of this scenario?

Both students would be investigated for Plagiarism.

Both students would be investigated for Collusion & Facilitation.

✅

Only the person who actually copied the work is to blame, so only the second student would be investigated for Plagiarism.

Переглянути це питання

UOW's Academic Integrity Policy identifies the key types of academic misconduct. From the following list, select the option that is NOT one of the key types of academic misconduct.

Collusion & Facilitating academic dishonesty

Cheating in an examination

Harassment and bribery

✅

Contract Cheating

Plagiarism

Misuse of generative AI

Academic Fraud

Misrepresentation and Fabrication

Переглянути це питання

Which of the following is NOT a value of academic integrity?

Respect